Sunday 19 May 2013

Dave's Journey a Personal Video of his Radiotherapy Treatment for Prostate Cancer


DAVE's JOURNEY - The chairman of Oxford Prostate Cancer Support Group

 PROSTATE CANCER RADIOTHERAPY VIDEO

   

 "If you would like to make a donation direct to OPCSG funds please go to:-

https://mydonate.bt.com/charities/oxfordshireprostatecancersupportgroup







 Oxford Prostate Cancer Support Group

Events · Our literature and posters · Useful Links · News Articles ...
www.opcsg.org










 

Monday 1 April 2013

PSA down again on last Cancer Clinic

Cancer clinic visit last Tuesday for check on my cancer and the good news is that the PSA has dropped again back to 21. This is after the rise from 21 to 24 on my visit to my family GP two weeks ago!
PSA tests are like riding a rollercoaster up and down like a yo yo !

Doctor decided to leave my treatment the same and reduce the time to 8 weeks to next PSA check and decide then !

Visited cancer clinic Tuesday 21st May 13 and PSA back up to 23.6, Dr again decided to leave treatment the same.new appt. in July.

Monday 18 February 2013

PSA Rise at Clinic Visit


Results of my last cancer clinic visit after 5 months interval, PSA Is up slightly to 21,the following is the Dr's report on my visit.
prostate-specific antigen model
Diagnosis

Prostate Cancer

Status

1. Gleason 9 (4+5) August 2007,bilateral carcinoma with extraprostatic extension and bone scan suggestive of sclerotic metastases in the inferior pubic ramus.

2) Commenced Zoladex September 2007,commenced Casosex for PSA progression May 2011.

3) Continues on follow-up


All sounded ominous and scary as I had never been in a hospital or seriously ill all my life in 63 years.
Still neither had my Father until he was 76 and contracted liver cancer and died shortly after diagnosis.
Add on top of my diagnosis that I was suffering almost total renal failure,and possibly had I not gone to the Dr. the day I did, another week or two of ignoring my symptoms and I may not have been here today 5 and half years later!!!

REMEMBER  some men have no symptoms at all and have progressive prostate cancer!!

SO ALL MEN GET A PSA CHECK TODAY IT JUST MAY SAVE YOUR LIFE,TAKE A FRIEND AND GET THEM CHECKED TOO IT MAY ALSO SAVE THEIR LIFE AS WELL!!!!!

Below are my current symptoms-

Current Symptoms History-Dr's Report following clinic visit 27/01/13

I reviewed Mr.Riley in clinic today.He remains well in himself with no symptoms of progressive disease.
His appetite is good.His weight has gone up slightly.He continues on Zoladex and Casodex.
I note that his PSA has risen slightly to 21.
For now I have suggested that we just continue on his medication and he is reviewed in two months time with repeat blood tests.

PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS IS NOT ALWAYS AN IMMEDIATE DEATH SENTENCE !!!!
GET TESTED TODAY !! NOT TOMORROW !!!!

I personally also believe a healthy diet helps control my cancer progression,whether that is true or not is still open for discussion worldwide!!, but different races have varying statistics on contracting this disease,so perhaps there is some truth in this!!

Please feel free to discuss this or any other topic about your own cancer in the comments.


Kallikrein-related peptidase 3
 prostate-specific antigen
Crystallographic structure of human (green/gold cartoon) covalently attached to ansubstrate acyl intermediate (multicolor sticks, carbon = white, nitrogen = blue, oxygen = red) and anglucosaminemanose disaccharide (spheres, carbon = yellow and oxygen = red).[1]
Available structures
PDBOrtholog search: PDBeRCSB
Identifiers
SymbolsKLK3; APS; KLK2A1; PSA; hK3
External IDsOMIM176820 MGI892021HomoloGene68141 ChEMBL2099GeneCardsKLK3 Gene
EC number3.4.21.77
RNA expression pattern
PBB GE KLK3 204582 s at tn.png
PBB GE KLK3 204583 x at tn.png
More reference expression data
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez35413646
EnsemblENSG00000142515ENSMUSG00000060177
UniProtP07288P15948
RefSeq (mRNA)NM_001030047.1NM_010114.1
RefSeq (protein)NP_001025218.1NP_034244.1
Location (UCSC)Chr 19:
51.36 – 51.36 Mb
Chr 7:
44.11 – 44.12 Mb
PubMedsearch[1][2]

Monday 21 January 2013

Oxford Prostrate Cancer Support Group |

Oxford Prostrate Cancer Support Group |
New Members all ways Welcome
   


 "If you would like to make a donation direct to OPCSG funds please go to:-

https://mydonate.bt.com/charities/oxfordshireprostatecancersupportgroup





www.ymoms.org

The above link will take you to a cancer survivor's blog,she has recovered from breast cancer and has written a book to help children understand their parents cancer in simple to understand ways. 

Monday 7 January 2013

Facts about calcium and dairy intake with Prostate Cancer


Calcium, Dairy Foods and Prostate Cancer
For about a decade, a growing number of studies have shown a relationship between consumption of dairy foods and/or calcium and the development of prostate cancer. While calcium is critical for healthy bones, there is also evidence that too much of a good thing may not be so good for men when it comes to prostate health.
In 2001, for example, the Harvard School of Public Health conducted a study in which the researchers followed 20,885 US physicians for 11 years. During that time, 1,012 men developed prostate cancer. When the investigators looked at how much calcium in the form of dairy products the men normally consumed, they found that those who averaged more than 600 mg calcium daily had a 32 percent higher risk of prostate cancer than those who regularly consumed 150 mg or less.
The American Cancer Society notes that there is evidence that high intake of calcium, mainly through supplements, has been linked with a greater risk of prostate cancer, especially aggressive cancer.
Some other studies however have challenged the idea that dairy foods and/or calcium increase the risk of prostate cancer. One was published in 2009 (Park 2009) and involved data from more than 490,000 older men and women (ages 50 to 71 when the study started in the 1990s), with an average follow-up of seven years. The results of this study show that, in older men, intake of dietary calcium of up to 1,300 mg daily in the form of dairy and other foods had no impact on the risk of prostate cancer—neither increasing nor decreasing the risk. The men who got most of their calcium from food did, however, enjoy a 30 percent less risk of cancer of the esophagus, a 20 percent less risk of head and neck cancer, and a 16 percent less chance of colon cancer when compared with men who consumed low amounts of calcium.
In a study conducted several years earlier and by some of the same researchers, the impact of calcium and dairy foods on the risk of prostate cancer was evaluated in 293,888 men who were followed up for six years. The researchers did not find an association between total and supplemental calcium intake and total and nonadvanced prostate cancer, but they did see a relationship between total calcium and advanced and fatal prostate cancer. Skim milk, but no other dairy foods, was associated with an increased risk of advanced prostate cancer, while calcium from nondairy foods was associated with a lower risk of nonadvanced prostate cancer. (Park et al 2007)
More recently, it was reported in Cancer Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research that amongst Chinese men, calcium consumption — even at relatively low levels and from non-dairy food sources such as soy, grains and green vegetables — may increase prostate cancer risk and that calcium plays a risk in enhancing the role of prostate cancer development, according to lead researcher Lesley M. Butler, Ph.D., assistant professor of epidemiology at Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO “. Dr. Butler added that “This study is the first to report an association between calcium and prostate cancer at such low levels and among primarily non-dairy foods.” The report also noted that some studies conducted in North American and European populations have linked high consumption of dairy products to an increased risk of prostate cancer. A few studies have suggested that calcium in milk is the causative factor, however the evidence is not clear.
See also
Colostrum Increases Risk of Prostate Cancer
Eggs may give you Prostate Cancer
Calcium Increases Prostate Cancer Risk in African American Men
Drinking Milk May Cause Prostate Cancer
Calcium supplements
101 Ways to Love Your Prostate
46 Things to Avoid for Prostate Health
World Health Organization Global Prostate Cancer
Incidence and Mortality Rates, 2008
One other interesting factor is that the countries with the highest meat and dairy counsumption are also those countires with the highest prostate cancer rates. Australia and New Zealand, Western Europe and the United States are significant consumers of dairy and meat and have the highest rates of cancer according to Worth Health Organization statistics.
Text Size

PLEASE VISIT MY BLOG @ cancerresearch.info.blogspot.com, FOR LATEST CANCER TREATMENT BREAKTHROUGHS

News and Opinions from Cancer Research.

New Asprin Can Fight Cancer,Daily Express

http://t.co/nt995sQG
www.emfnews.org www.emfnews.org www.emfnews.org Technology will always be part of the human culture as it makes our life easier than the way it used to be. However, you might also need to notice that it also has its own risk as we speak about the life, especially the health risk like what the cell phone is shown for us. Cancer could be one of many effects that is given by the cell phone as well as the mobile telephone and it becomes main concern for many people. Radiofrequency is one important factor we should know as the reason why cell phone could be really dangerous for our health. Radiofrequency energy that it is emitted by these phones is kind of dangerous and it is important for you to concern much more about that. What do you know about the radiofrequency energy? Have you ever heard of it before? Form of electromagnetic radiation could be the simplest definition of what radiofrequency is and it can be divided into two big forms, which are ionizing (eg, x-rays, radon, and cosmic rays) and non-ionizing (eg, radiofrequency and extremely low-frequency or power frequency). By the time you get so close with that kind of radiation, the chance you get the cancer becomes much bigger than the way it used to be. Non-ionizing might be not dangerous as you see that there are no significant effects that thing to the human health. The general consensus has been that there is no consistent evidence that non-ionizing radiation increases cancer risk. Based on the research of WHO ...