Monday 18 February 2013

PSA Rise at Clinic Visit


Results of my last cancer clinic visit after 5 months interval, PSA Is up slightly to 21,the following is the Dr's report on my visit.
prostate-specific antigen model
Diagnosis

Prostate Cancer

Status

1. Gleason 9 (4+5) August 2007,bilateral carcinoma with extraprostatic extension and bone scan suggestive of sclerotic metastases in the inferior pubic ramus.

2) Commenced Zoladex September 2007,commenced Casosex for PSA progression May 2011.

3) Continues on follow-up


All sounded ominous and scary as I had never been in a hospital or seriously ill all my life in 63 years.
Still neither had my Father until he was 76 and contracted liver cancer and died shortly after diagnosis.
Add on top of my diagnosis that I was suffering almost total renal failure,and possibly had I not gone to the Dr. the day I did, another week or two of ignoring my symptoms and I may not have been here today 5 and half years later!!!

REMEMBER  some men have no symptoms at all and have progressive prostate cancer!!

SO ALL MEN GET A PSA CHECK TODAY IT JUST MAY SAVE YOUR LIFE,TAKE A FRIEND AND GET THEM CHECKED TOO IT MAY ALSO SAVE THEIR LIFE AS WELL!!!!!

Below are my current symptoms-

Current Symptoms History-Dr's Report following clinic visit 27/01/13

I reviewed Mr.Riley in clinic today.He remains well in himself with no symptoms of progressive disease.
His appetite is good.His weight has gone up slightly.He continues on Zoladex and Casodex.
I note that his PSA has risen slightly to 21.
For now I have suggested that we just continue on his medication and he is reviewed in two months time with repeat blood tests.

PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS IS NOT ALWAYS AN IMMEDIATE DEATH SENTENCE !!!!
GET TESTED TODAY !! NOT TOMORROW !!!!

I personally also believe a healthy diet helps control my cancer progression,whether that is true or not is still open for discussion worldwide!!, but different races have varying statistics on contracting this disease,so perhaps there is some truth in this!!

Please feel free to discuss this or any other topic about your own cancer in the comments.


Kallikrein-related peptidase 3
 prostate-specific antigen
Crystallographic structure of human (green/gold cartoon) covalently attached to ansubstrate acyl intermediate (multicolor sticks, carbon = white, nitrogen = blue, oxygen = red) and anglucosaminemanose disaccharide (spheres, carbon = yellow and oxygen = red).[1]
Available structures
PDBOrtholog search: PDBeRCSB
Identifiers
SymbolsKLK3; APS; KLK2A1; PSA; hK3
External IDsOMIM176820 MGI892021HomoloGene68141 ChEMBL2099GeneCardsKLK3 Gene
EC number3.4.21.77
RNA expression pattern
PBB GE KLK3 204582 s at tn.png
PBB GE KLK3 204583 x at tn.png
More reference expression data
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez35413646
EnsemblENSG00000142515ENSMUSG00000060177
UniProtP07288P15948
RefSeq (mRNA)NM_001030047.1NM_010114.1
RefSeq (protein)NP_001025218.1NP_034244.1
Location (UCSC)Chr 19:
51.36 – 51.36 Mb
Chr 7:
44.11 – 44.12 Mb
PubMedsearch[1][2]

PLEASE VISIT MY BLOG @ cancerresearch.info.blogspot.com, FOR LATEST CANCER TREATMENT BREAKTHROUGHS

News and Opinions from Cancer Research.

New Asprin Can Fight Cancer,Daily Express

http://t.co/nt995sQG
www.emfnews.org www.emfnews.org www.emfnews.org Technology will always be part of the human culture as it makes our life easier than the way it used to be. However, you might also need to notice that it also has its own risk as we speak about the life, especially the health risk like what the cell phone is shown for us. Cancer could be one of many effects that is given by the cell phone as well as the mobile telephone and it becomes main concern for many people. Radiofrequency is one important factor we should know as the reason why cell phone could be really dangerous for our health. Radiofrequency energy that it is emitted by these phones is kind of dangerous and it is important for you to concern much more about that. What do you know about the radiofrequency energy? Have you ever heard of it before? Form of electromagnetic radiation could be the simplest definition of what radiofrequency is and it can be divided into two big forms, which are ionizing (eg, x-rays, radon, and cosmic rays) and non-ionizing (eg, radiofrequency and extremely low-frequency or power frequency). By the time you get so close with that kind of radiation, the chance you get the cancer becomes much bigger than the way it used to be. Non-ionizing might be not dangerous as you see that there are no significant effects that thing to the human health. The general consensus has been that there is no consistent evidence that non-ionizing radiation increases cancer risk. Based on the research of WHO ...