Monday 29 October 2012

Should I Have Radical Prostatectomy or Wait and Monitor


Your important Prostate Cancer Treatment Options


A new study in the New England Journal of Medicine finds men who opt to surgically remove their prostate gland - a procedure called a radical prostatectomy - are no less likely to die than men who choose wait and monitor their symptoms to see if the cancer progresses.  These findings fall in line with mounting concerns about the over screening and overtreatment of prostate tumors in the U.S.  Each year, millions of men are screened for early disease and, based on the results, many undergo invasive biopsies, surgery or other cancer treatment for tumors that would not have killed them anyway.  The procedures may cause impotence, incontinence and even death; as many as 1,000 to 1,300 men die due to complications associated with treatments prompted by screening.

Because of this research, people should be reminded to seek the knowledge and advice of more than one doctor and get a second opinion to validate their treatment option choice.  

If you have been diagnosed with prostate cancer, you know there are many treatment options with various risks and side effects. Visit www.researchprostatecancer.com for a great resource to learn more about your treatment options or download our free prostate cancer guide. 

Wednesday 17 October 2012

Could Prostate Treatment for Dogs Help Men


Prostate cancer treatment found safe for dogs could eventually be used for men


October 16, 2012 By Mike Lear
Treatment that has been found safe for prostate cancer in man’s best friend could eventually benefit man as well.

Sandra Axiak-Bechtel says the gold nanoparticle therapy that has proven safe in dogs must now be tested for its effectiveness in treatment of prostate cancer.
Scientists at the University of Missouri have found that injecting gold nanoparticles into prostate cancer tumors in dogs is safe for the dogs. Doctor Sandra Axiak-Bechtel, an assistant professor in oncology at the MU College of Veterinary Medicine, says when made radioactive those particles give off a lot of energy for a short period, theoretically killing off a lot of cancer cells faster.
“The gold nanoparticle itself if compared to traditional brachytherapy that is used in people tends to distribute better throughout the tumor and actually cause less side effects.”
The nanoparticles are injected into the prostate tumor, guided by CT scans, while the dogs are under anesthesia.
The idea came from work at the MU School of Medicine and the College of Arts and Science. Axiak-Bechtel says one of their advancements was finding a way to keep those nanoparticles from aggregating, which makes them really hard to use for treatment. “Doctor Kattesh Katti and a whole group at the Department of Radiology have actually coated them with gum arabic, which is a natural and very non-toxic product that keeps them from aggregating. What that means is that we can use them very safely for treatment without having or anticipating any side effects.”
Now that the treatment has been proven safe, the next step is to test its effectiveness.
“At this point we’re way too early in our study to determine whether or not we think this is as effective as brachytherapy or even more effective than traditional brachytherapy.”
If it proves effective, it could be a promising treatment for men. “Because prostate tumors are so similar in the way that they behave in dogs compared to the very aggressive disease in men, we anticipate that any side effects we would see in the dog would be the same as what we would see in a person.”
Axiak-Bechtel says she’s also excited for what the work could mean for dogs.
“It’s a very, very difficult tumor to treat and we just don’t have very effective treatments at this point in time for prostate cancer in dogs, so the ability to not just help men in the future but also help dogs is very important.”
The dogs involved are pets brought to the University for treatment, not research animals.
Share this:
Filed Under: Featured, Health & Medicine, Human Interest, News Tagged With: dogs, gold nanoparticle, prostate cancer, Sandra Axiak-Bechtel, University of Missouri College of Arts and Science, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine

PLEASE VISIT MY BLOG @ cancerresearch.info.blogspot.com, FOR LATEST CANCER TREATMENT BREAKTHROUGHS

News and Opinions from Cancer Research.

New Asprin Can Fight Cancer,Daily Express

http://t.co/nt995sQG
www.emfnews.org www.emfnews.org www.emfnews.org Technology will always be part of the human culture as it makes our life easier than the way it used to be. However, you might also need to notice that it also has its own risk as we speak about the life, especially the health risk like what the cell phone is shown for us. Cancer could be one of many effects that is given by the cell phone as well as the mobile telephone and it becomes main concern for many people. Radiofrequency is one important factor we should know as the reason why cell phone could be really dangerous for our health. Radiofrequency energy that it is emitted by these phones is kind of dangerous and it is important for you to concern much more about that. What do you know about the radiofrequency energy? Have you ever heard of it before? Form of electromagnetic radiation could be the simplest definition of what radiofrequency is and it can be divided into two big forms, which are ionizing (eg, x-rays, radon, and cosmic rays) and non-ionizing (eg, radiofrequency and extremely low-frequency or power frequency). By the time you get so close with that kind of radiation, the chance you get the cancer becomes much bigger than the way it used to be. Non-ionizing might be not dangerous as you see that there are no significant effects that thing to the human health. The general consensus has been that there is no consistent evidence that non-ionizing radiation increases cancer risk. Based on the research of WHO ...